🔗 Share this article

Throughout last year's presidential campaign, the former president wooed the electorate with promises to reduce costs starting on day one. However, once his inauguration, there was minimal focus to the cost of living. All that changed after inflation-weary citizens expressed dissatisfaction at the ballot box. Shortly thereafter, his team launched a slapdash effort to address living costs. Unfortunately, this initiative has proven a disorganized endeavor—filled with illogical claims, contradictions, magical thinking, blame-shifting, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Detached Claims and Supermarket Truth

Merely 48 hours after the election, Trump began his cost-reduction push with a disastrous remark: “Food prices are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” This comment from billionaire Trump—who frequently mingles with fellow billionaires—revealed utter contempt for millions of Americans who struggle every time they go the grocery store. In effect, he ignored their concerns as unimportant, suggesting they were mistaken about actual costs.

This statement about declining prices was absurdly obtuse and dishonest. In what way could all costs be falling when his cherished tariffs were increasing prices? Recent data indicate the cost of bananas rose 6.9% over the past year, the price of beef climbed 14.7%, and coffee prices jumped 18.9%—in part due to import taxes applied to Brazilian products. In the first three quarters, prices rose in the majority of main grocery groups tracked by the Consumer Price Index, such as animal proteins (up 4.5%), drinks (increasing nearly 3%), and fruits and vegetables (up 1.3%).

Inconsistencies and Inaccuracies in Financial Claims

Despite these numbers, the president persists in repeating his big lie about affordability. After the vote, he has stated there is “almost no price increases,” declared “costs have fallen significantly,” and asserted “it is far less expensive under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” Such remarks contradict the reality that prices overall have clearly increased since Biden left office. Currently, price growth is at a 3% annual rate, that’s half again as much than the central bank’s target of 2 percent. Adding to the inaccuracies, Trump boasted that fuel costs had dropped to nearly $2 a gallon, despite official data show they average over three dollars.

Faced with actual conditions and declining opinion polls, some Trump aides apparently cautioned that his “costs are falling” rhetoric made him sound disconnected from typical Americans. Many voters are angry about prices continuing to climb following assurances of reductions. As a result, aides proposed a simple solution: roll back certain import taxes. This sensible idea clashed with the president’s unrealistic claim that new tariffs would not increase costs for American shoppers.

Proposed Fixes and Their Potential Impact

As certain taxes reduced on several food items, the administration will likely claim that he has lowered costs once these products begin to fall in price. That would be similar to a firestarter boasting for putting out a blaze that he had started. On another occasion, while speaking McDonald’s executives, Trump declared that “we are in the golden age of America” and told listeners that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” These comments are easy for a billionaire to make, but seem insincere to millions of Americans facing hardships—particularly when many risk losing food stamps or skyrocketing health premiums.

Per a survey conducted last fall, three-quarters of respondents think the state of the economy are fair or poor, while only 26% consider them good or excellent. A separate survey showed that 61% of Americans feel Trump’s policies have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Financial Truth and Suggested Measures

The treasury secretary, Trump’s chief financial officer, lately disputed claims of a prosperous era. He stated that instead of thriving, some parts of the American economy “are in recession.” The manufacturing sector—which Trump vowed to save—seems to have shrunk for eight months in a row and lost around tens of thousands of positions since January. Pointing to these challenges, Bessent called on the central bank to cut interest rates—an action that could ease financial pressure.

In response to widespread concern about living costs, Trump suggested a cash handout of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “the wealthy.” To numerous struggling Americans, this sounds like manna from heaven, but it is unlikely that lawmakers—already alarmed about large shortfalls—will enact such a plan. The scheme would likely increase federal spending, increase borrowing costs, and potentially fuel inflation by putting more money into consumers’ pockets.

A further supposed fix for affordability centered on creating 50-year mortgages, based on the idea that this would lower housing costs. But, reality is that 50-year mortgages have minimal impact to reduce installments—often cutting them by just $100 or $200 each month. The drawback is that these mortgages could significantly increase the total interest borrowers pay and slow their accumulation of equity.

Blaming the Past Government and Economic Prospects

As part of their cost-cutting effort, the administration have once more pointed fingers at the previous president for economic problems, such as rising prices. Officials stated they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up Biden’s inflation.” This is absurd and untruthful allegations. In reality, Biden left a strong economy, with low price growth, economic growth strong, and minimal joblessness. However, Trump’s policies—particularly his tariffs—have created an economic mess, driving costs higher and reducing economic output.

Per Mark Zandi, lead analyst at Moody’s Analytics, 22 states are already in recession, with their conditions worsened by Trump’s tariffs. Zandi fears that if large states like major economies enter a downturn, the US could face a widespread recession. In downturns, people typically have reduced funds to spend, and inflation often falls. Unfortunately, with the highly-touted cost initiative likely to do little to hold down prices, his primary method for improving living standards might end up triggering an economic contraction—something that hard-pressed households really can’t afford.