🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law remarked he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for portraying the Russian leader in a new film. This production, however, may align so closely with the carefully constructed version circulated by Russian state media that, within Russia, it reads as a endorsement rather than a challenge.

The Crafted Superhero

Over a long period, the Kremlin and its entertainment industry have collaborated to craft a tailor-made persona of Putin. This character is a political superhero devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who consistently understands more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a television show launched last fall, helmed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “rescue” Russia from chaos. While the character's name Mikhail, the message is unmistakable: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions often end up reinforcing this identical story instead of debunking it. An adaptation based on a bestselling satirical novel sets out to subvert the Putin cult by framing him not as a cause but as a consequence, moving the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, the president is shown as having been chosen by influential figures to steady the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to become president. His response is that he would rather govern from the shadows, desiring enduring influence.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. Historically, none of this took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one ever begged him to accept the role. The position was in essence a casting call with many contenders. Central to this process stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the state de facto.

• His list featured several politicians, among them an opposition leader later murdered and a former spy chief.
• Per an expert who researched his rise, the chosen candidate merely met the required parameters: obedient, from the intelligence world, and politically neutral.
• A businessman familiar with the process stated the key criterion was controllability and loyalty, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the image of Putin as a master operative was built after the fact. Stories about his clandestine activities in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not engaged in actual agent work.

Interestingly, the move to framing him as a “007” may in part have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s arrival as James Bond. The grittier interpretation prompted local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with Putin. Mashup posters replacing the actor's likeness with his appeared on city centers, fueling the increasing trend to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an star well-liked by Russian audiences, the authorities are likely to seize the chance to frame his casting as a small victory. Its exclusion of mass protests, the political rivals, or prominent activists from its narrative, despite covering the past decade, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

In Russian cinema, Putin is frequently an all-powerful presence who remains unseen directly. He is signaled through portraits or calls “from above”. In this new film, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently echo the exact legends it might seek to question.