🔗 Share this article

A Danish man has been convicted of uploading nude scenes from protected films and TV series on the social media platform Reddit.

Based on a law enforcement report obtained by media outlets, the anonymous individual posted 347 video excerpts of explicit scenes in a Reddit group he moderated, which were then viewed 4.2 million-plus times.

Danish authorities state he has been handed a seven-month suspended sentence for violating copyright laws.

Legal analysts explain the man was charged under a seldom-invoked clause in Denmark's copyright law, with the court ruling that by removing the footage out of their original context, the accused had damaged the performers' "moral rights".

He has also been found guilty of distributing more than 25 terabytes of copyrighted digital content.

From spring 2022 to May 2023, the user using the alias "KlammereFyr" on Reddit uploaded adult scenes including over 100 actresses.

He shared them in the forum he was a administrator of.

Per the Danish copyright protection group The Rights Alliance (TRA), his subreddit had more than 6,000 members and users were prompted to request clips of particular actors.

In 2023, campaigners filed the incident to the police on behalf of the impacted artists, filmmakers and producers, which led to the subreddit being shut down.

Andrea Vagn Jensen, among the actresses whose nude content were shared in the community, told local media at the time she believed there was a difference between appearing naked in a movie and being shown on Reddit.

The actress said the uploads constituted "abuse".

'An important message'

The man was detained in September 2024 and pleaded guilty to the allegations recently.

In a comment after the verdict, TRA head Maria Fredenslund said the decision sent an "significant" message "indicating violations of artists' rights has repercussions".

The ruling is considered unique in the country for its use of the "ethical protections" clause of the Danish Copyright Act, which specifies an creator's creation cannot be used in a manner which violates their standing.

Intellectual property expert a legal scholar told BBC News the case was "rare" for its focus on the damage to the dignity of an artist, rather than to them financially.

How the case could influence other countries is unclear.

But she added there may be "more and more of these actions" in the coming years with the growth of artificial intelligence, where "the integrity of an individual's creative output might be compromised with greater ease".